Word came out today that the union which represents the Bart's station agents and train operators plans to strike starting at midnight on Sunday.
This comes after the union's negotiators concluded an agreement with Bart management, which the union's membership proceeded to vote down by a three-to-one margin.
All the reporting I've seen suggests this strike could last some time, since it's unclear who management should even contact to advance negotiations. Union menbers obviously don't have any faith in their own negotiating team, so I guess they'll have to select new negotiators.
A long Bart shutdown does no one any good, including the workers who are striking. As we saw after the strike 10 years ago, some riders are likely to abandon Bart, because they will find better ways to commute. Other riders will choose other options just out of spite.
In the meantime, it's important to remember that the workers who turned down the contract offer are those with the worst ratio of pay to skills. Bart's station agents and drivers are the highest paid in the country.
And, what they do requires virtually no training. The trains are virtually automated -- and have a history of crashes when drivers switch them into manual mode. The station agents are largely there just to say "no" to customers, and in any case their customer service role is not hard to teach.
When I call these folks overpaid, I'm not making an idle point. These Bart employees make high double-digit salaries, when benefits are included. Some make over $100k, milking their seniority and
Beyond the pay issues, there are the ridiculous work rules detailed at Bart management's website -- http://www.bartlabor.com. One example is a rule preventing Bart from asking station agents to work at stations more than a certain distance apart during any given week. Such rules cost the system money and are completely absurd considering the agents can literally ride the train they're supposed to be helping manage to get to their assignments.
I can understand paying a premium for the people who service and repair the trains. Bart uses a lot of non-standard equipment, so there's an important element of institutional memory to protect there.
But the station agents and train drivers just don't add that much value. Faced with a strike caused by these folks, it's time for Bart management to consider firing all of them and starting over with non-union workers.
Admittedly, such an approach will take some time for training, but I doubt the training time would exceed by much the time it will take to renegotiate with the union. More importantly, eliminating the union provides management a clean slate to reduce pay and benefits to reasonable levels.
I'm sure there are people out there with skills similar to those required to perform these two jobs. In the short term, Bart can find a couple dozen of these folks, train them quickly and get a few of the core stations up and running -- West Oakland and Embarcadero at a minimum. That way, we can avoid the scenario where people can't make it into the city for their jobs.
Unfortunately, I expect Bart's management and directors to view this strike as mostly a political problem. As such, they are unlikely to fire the union workers, since our area is full of Leftist wackos who will support a union even as it chokes the lifeblood out of our transit infrastructure -- an ironic situation when you consider that most Leftists are all for commuter trains.
This strike is going to create a difficult situation for people who work in the private sector. It's also going to discourage people about the future of public transit in the area, which can only be bad for the East Bay, which relies on Bart to take commuters into the city.
What's worse, it's not going to buy the union members anything. The reality is their contracts are completely unsustainable. The best they can hope for is some sort of temporary bone funded by a fare or tax increase.
But the public is losing patience with public-employee unions. Eventually that is going to translate into much tougher negotiating stances. Perhaps this strike will be the beginning of the end for these folks, but I'm not counting on it.
The right solution for Bart is the simplest one. Take a page out of the Reagan playbook and fire every one of these workers.
Please don't forget that not all Bart Worker's are striking. 2 of the 3 unions were willing to come to an agreement. To me, that says a lot.ReplyDelete
On the other hand, how the hell can it cost so much to get back and forth from SF. It cost me over 8 dollars round trip from San Leandro. Given that Bart is projecting a 340 million deficit over the next four years, and that they are only getting 100 million in savings from the Union, they are still short over 200 million. Is there going to be more service cuts and fare increases?
With the economy in the shape it is in and these thieves want a raise??? Really??? How about we fire all of them have a one day job fair and all the positions would be filled in one day with non union people, not these thugs that dont have there own spine and hide behind the union to fight there battles. Then whoever made the call to fire them all, rename the transit system after him like they did for Ronald Reagan and the new DC airport.ReplyDelete
The reason the cost of transit is so high is the cost of labor. Reduce the cost of overpaid Union skag labor and the rest of the cost will come down.ReplyDelete
Now, now, now... my worry is that the ATU will be talked out of striking. Where better to begin the undoing of government worker unions than in the most union friendly place in the country? History is not made when bad things are avoided. BART is just one of hundreds of examples of fiscal insanity where strikes are threatened in the absense of competitive market forces. Ironically, the unioization of government workers began under the watch of California's current Attorney General, Jerry Brown... who wants to play Governor once again.ReplyDelete
All unions need to be busted they are the ones breaking the back of business in this country. Everyone wonders why everything is outsourced overseas to be made???? Open up your eyes its not real difficult to figure out. Look at what Toyota and Honda do for workers here , most are contracted sub contractors, they get paid average of $50hr but they take care of their own healthcare and retirement. If Government Motors had done this many years ago they would not be Government owned today. Unions have destroyed the american worker and with it american business.ReplyDelete
Unions made the American middle class. If you are against working people making a good wage, you are unamerican. CEOs have destroyed manufacturing in this country, not workers. It was not union workers who green lighted the Chevette, for instance. Union workers had nothing to do with the Enron debacle. Union workers also would not be funneling money into the Chinese military, via Wal-Mart. Strong unions would help prevent illegal immigration as well.ReplyDelete
Every union isn't perfect, like all the awesome anti-union politicians & executives, who are contantly doing their level best for workers, consumers, 7 our country.ReplyDelete
Enron, Enron, Enron. What a crock of nonsense! American unions, unlike European unions, are the result of massive waves of immigration. The "labor contractors" were the bilingual and clever... who collected the money and kept a little too much for themselves. European unions are manifestations of class struggle... 'cause the Eurotrashians actually have an official aristocracy. America was a middle class paradise long before Samuel Gompers was a glimmer in his father's eye. The only difference between the American labor movement and the Greek myths is that the Greek myths are based on reality.ReplyDelete
I want BART workers to get a fair deal but I don't think they should have the power to shut down bay area comuters.ReplyDelete
They should go to binding arbitration.
The problem with unions is for each $100k job they create, they destroy 2 or 3 potential $60k jobs.ReplyDelete