General01 Jul 2011 07:18 am

I know it’s not as exciting and seemingly timely a topic as budget chest thumping by the city council, but the most important article to come out in months is right here.

I assume no one has talked about this article either because they’re not sure what to say or because of political correctness.

For those of you who chose not to read it, the census reported that the population of black youth in Oakland dropped by 42.3 percent from 2000 to 2010. This mirrors the trends we’ve seen in enrollments at Oakland Unified, where something like 25 percent of the black population is gone, replaced largely by hispanics and others.

But it does more than mirror it. 42.3 percent is an enormous number. It’s unprecedented, really. Oakland’s decline mirrors that in New Orleans, according to the article, where Katrina literally forced thousands of people to leave the city.

As always, I’m not a big fan of how our media sorts everything by race, but the data is here. As everyone knows, young blacks commit a hugely disproportionate share of crimes in Oakland, and their scores on standardized tests tend to be substantially lower.

All of this makes me very curious as to what the next 10 years hold for Oakland. We already know that much of the traditional black political base has eroded. But that goes along with the much more moderate decline in overall black population.

This huge drop in the child population could mean much more rapid gentrification for the city. The reason is that the next demographic up in terms of age (early 20s) is really the sweet spot for criminality. Reducing that demographic substantially can’t help but ┬áreduce crime in the coming years.

I don’t know what role this plays in the current battles over police staffing. I do know that no one will discuss it in this context, for obvious reasons. The only feedback you will see in the popular media is people like Jean Quan describing the shift as a “problem.”

For me, it’s kind of hard to see it as a problem. I own property here, and I know that its value will increase if crime decreases. And frankly I suspect a lot of the people of all races still living here feel exactly the same way, even if political correctness prevents them from saying it out loud.

My prediction is a steep drop in crime over then next five to 10 years, followed by pronouncements from the cops about how they became “more efficient and effective.” The truth will be far simpler — demographics is destiny. Don’t believe me? Take a drive through our local segregated enclave, Piedmont.

del.icio.us |  Digg |  FURL |  Yahoo! My Web 2.0 |  Reddit

5 Responses to “Oakland’s Shocking Demographic Shift”

  1. on 11 Jul 2011 at 4:00 pm mark ross

    1) The linked article on the census also said that, as a national aggregate, the number of White children declined at a much greater rate than Black. 2) Many years ago I had dinner with the former sheriff of Alameda County (the guy before Plummer). He was emphatic that crime stats are almost entirely a function of the number of young males in the jurisdiction in question. The law enforcement honchos like to take credit… but demographics is the real reason. 3) My pet sociologic theory concerns the birth dearth of the 1930s. Hard economic times severely reduced the American birth rate. There were fewer children in people’s lives. The Hollywood box office put Shirley Temple at the top. Other “youth” themes also dominated: Jackies Cooper and Coogan in the Skippy movies, Mickey Rooney and Judy Garland, the Our Gang Comedies with Darla Hood and Spanky MacFarlane (not to mention Alfalfa, Buckweat, etc.), and the Dead End Kids with Muggs McGinnis. And 4)
    “Gentrification” is a dirty word to the White radical leftists in our midst. It implies a quantitative reduction in their loser clientele… and is antithetical to their entire political purpose.

  2. on 19 Jul 2011 at 1:33 pm erdoc

    When speaking of crime, it becomes even more specific. Nearly all of the crime in Oakland attributed to black males, can be attributed to black males who grew up in single parent families. This is also true nationwide.

    Did you know that black males have longer life spans when they are incarcerated vs. those on the outside..?

  3. on 19 Jul 2011 at 8:56 pm TheBoss

    Yikes. I’m not sure that’s all true, erdoc. Black males commit crime at higher rates than their proportion of the population, but it’s not as extreme as you’re describing. Same in Oakland.

  4. on 13 Aug 2011 at 11:02 pm Blackie

    erdoc is correct. According to Chief Batts 97% of murders in Oakland are black on black.

    DOJ stats bear this out.

  5. on 07 Dec 2011 at 7:54 pm Sierra

    Those black families moving out of Oakland are most likely middle class families that found work elsewhere and moved to avoid the violence described by “erdoc” and “Blackie”. Poor families, historically and statistically, do not move often. If so, this shift might not have a significant affect on crime rates as middle class children are less likely to commit crimes. These claims are unsupported by specific evidence other than common sense logic.

Trackback this Post | Feed on comments to this Post

Leave a Reply