Comments on: $500,000 A Year Civil Servant Pensions – Only In California http://www.eastbayconservative.com/2009/06/01/500000-a-year-civil-servant-pensions-only-in-california/ Words from a Non-Leftist Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:31:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: glenn http://www.eastbayconservative.com/2009/06/01/500000-a-year-civil-servant-pensions-only-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-3368 glenn Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:04:22 +0000 http://www.eastbayconservative.com/2009/06/01/500000-a-year-civil-servant-pensions-only-in-california/#comment-3368 I enjoyed this article. To the above comment I say 100k is an absurd pension for a government worker........no private sector jobs offer a pension at all. People need to manage their money, their lives, their investments........ I enjoyed this article. To the above comment I say 100k is an absurd pension for a government worker……..no private sector jobs offer a pension at all.

People need to manage their money, their lives, their investments……..

]]> By: Alan http://www.eastbayconservative.com/2009/06/01/500000-a-year-civil-servant-pensions-only-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-2402 Alan Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:50:51 +0000 http://www.eastbayconservative.com/2009/06/01/500000-a-year-civil-servant-pensions-only-in-california/#comment-2402 Even if we were able to get out of the contracts, do you think they'd negotiate better the next time? It seems there should be cap. No matter what you did while on the job, $100k / year seems a pretty good pension. We talk about the big numbers but really it's that *everyone* is getting 90% or whatever of their salary, right? Seems there should be a sliding scale. Even if we were able to get out of the contracts, do you think they’d negotiate better the next time?

It seems there should be cap. No matter what you did while on the job, $100k / year seems a pretty good pension. We talk about the big numbers but really it’s that *everyone* is getting 90% or whatever of their salary, right?

Seems there should be a sliding scale.

]]>